> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://johnwlittle.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# Edward Snowden: Naive NSA Whistleblower, Spy, or Something Else Entirely?
- URL: https://johnwlittle.com/edward-snowden-naive-nsa-whistleblower-spy-or-something-else-entirely/
- Published: 2013-06-10T00:26:15.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-21T20:06:34.000Z
- Description: Edward Snowden’s disclosures raised difficult questions about surveillance, secrecy, and the responsibilities of intelligence professionals. His motives and the consequences of his actions deserve scrutiny beyond the competing labels of whistleblower and spy.
- Author: John Little
- Tags: Intelligence, Counterintelligence, Edward Snowden, China, Russia

Where to begin with Mr. Snowden? Are we to believe that a highly paid IC contractor left his comfortable job in Hawaii, ditched his girlfriend, flew to Hong Kong and turned over a motherlode of intelligence community secrets for some sort of Manning-esque idealism? Oh, and while sitting in a hotel on Chinese turf (which has been getting absolutely hammered by the U.S. for its hacking and digital espionage activities) he drops comments like this:

“We hack everyone everywhere. We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries.”

We don’t know if Snowden has ties to a foreign intelligence service but if China could have planted words in the mouth of Mr. Snowden it would have sounded something like that. OK, it would have sounded exactly like that.

It is true that China is not overtly an enemy of the United States. However, in this context they are absolutely a hostile force. So we have the naive idealist Edward Snowden sitting in hostile territory, releasing information which [damages the United States](http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci%5F23427140/nsa-leaker-edward-snowden-fled-hong-kong-faces?ref=johnwlittle.com), and spouting a message which seems designed to [deflect harsh criticism from his (indirect) hosts](http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/06/10/mixed-emotions-online-as-hero-snowden-shows-up-in-hong-kong/?ref=johnwlittle.com). Did I mention that he’s doing all of this as President Obama is [meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping](http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/06/08/obama-xi-take-stroll/2403823/?ref=johnwlittle.com) on cyber issues? Right. Does that sound like a whistleblower or does that sound like a [spy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip%5FAgee?ref=johnwlittle.com)?

If we are to believe him, Edward Snowden is sitting in a hotel room in Hong Kong [without a plan](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-hong-kong-gamble?ref=johnwlittle.com) and without a friend in the world. He’s terrified. He’s stuffing pillows against the door to prevent eavesdropping. He’s paranoid. He doesn’t know where to turn. And oh, by the way, he claims access to nearly every secret known to the U.S. intelligence community. Perhaps Iceland will take him in, he says – apparently unaware that he’s a man wanted not just by his home country but by virtually every security service on the planet. What a pickle, right?

Is he really that stupid?

Of course, the interview in Hong Kong could have been a bit of theater staged by his handlers. It certainly feels that way based on what we are hearing. There is also the possibility that the media outlets pushing this story are engaging in a bit of deception in the interest of Edward Snowden’s security. Anything is possible at this point. Still, Edward Snowden could have crafted any number of significantly more graceful exits for himself but instead we have this and everything about it reads a bit off, doesn’t it?

The bottom line at this point is that more information is needed. Very few people can claim to understand Edward Snowden’s true motives (much less call him a “[hero](http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/10/opinion/rushkoff-snowden-hero/index.html?ref=johnwlittle.com)” or a spy) but I suspect we will know soon enough.